Mistral AI

Executive Summary

What it is: Mistral AI offers Vibe for code, a coding agent across terminal (Vibe CLI), IDE (VS Code / JetBrains plugin), and background remote agents, plus consumer plans and the La Plateforme API. Plans run Free ($0 with $10/mo in API credits), Pro ($14.99/mo with $30/mo in API credits), Team ($24.99/user/mo), Education ($5.99/mo for verified students), and Enterprise (custom); Pro at $14.99/mo sits between GitHub Copilot Pro ($10/mo) and Claude Pro and Cursor Pro ($20/mo each) (https://github.com/features/copilot/plans , https://www.anthropic.com/pricing , https://cursor.com/pricing). The first-party coding lineup is unchanged: Mistral Medium 3.5 at $1.50/$7.50 per MTok (256K context) and Codestral at $0.30/$0.90 per MTok; Google's 3.8 Flash intro rate ($0.75/$3.75 through Dec 31, 2026) undercuts Medium 3.5 today but doubles to the same $1.50/$7.50 on Jan 1, 2027 (https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/generative-ai/pricing). The September addition is hosted Z.ai GLM 5.3, a third-party open-weight coding model with 1M context at $1.40/$4.40 per MTok; Z.ai sells GLM-5.3 direct at identical input/output rates but a $0.26/MTok cache-read price versus Mistral's $0.14 (https://docs.z.ai/guides/overview/pricing). Source: https://mistral.ai/pricing

What to watch out for: Five CVEs in the Vibe CLI's shell permission layer (CVE-2026-87984 through -87988, affecting versions back to 1.3.4) allowed arbitrary code execution from a malicious repository without the expected approval prompt, fixed in Vibe 2.25.4 on Sep 12 with further hardening through 2.25.8; anyone on an older CLI should upgrade immediately (https://blog.secmate.dev/posts/mistral-vibe-cve-2026-87987-cve-2026-87984/). No first-party coding model shipped in September: Codestral has not been refreshed in 14 months and Medium 3.5 in 5 months, the exact "structural gap" the August report warned about, and Mistral's answer is hosting Z.ai's GLM instead. Model lifecycles are accelerating in the other direction too: Leanstral 1.5 and OCR 4.0 were both deprecated Sep 29 and retired Sep 30, roughly three months after launch (https://docs.mistral.ai/models/overview). Plan usage limits remain undisclosed in absolute terms, and the pricing page still says the CLI and IDE are "powered by Devstral" even though Devstral 2 retired July 31 (https://mistral.ai/pricing).

Bottom line: September's story was capital and distribution, not models: a €3B Series D at more than €21B post-money led by Samsung (Sep 8), a Cloudera partnership covering fully air-gapped deployment (Sep 10), and Mozilla's Firefox Smart Window powered by Mistral models (Sep 16), while the coding catalog stood still and got a fast security patch. For coding-agent buyers, the working entry points are Pro at $14.99/mo plus $30/mo API credits, Medium 3.5 at $1.50/$7.50 per MTok, and, new this month, GLM 5.3 at $1.40/$4.40 with 1M context and $0.14 cached input, the only 1M-context coding model served under Mistral's EU regional controls. Treat Mistral as the sovereignty and price play, not the frontier play: the highest-voted substantive critique this month claims Medium 3.5 loses to sub-32B open models in business benchmarks (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49606808). Sources: https://mistral.ai/news/mistral-makes-sovereign-open-weight-ai-to-frontier/ , https://mistral.ai/pricing/api/

Key Terms

Latest Changes

Changes since the 2026-08 report.

  • Funding: €3B Series D at more than €21B post-money (Sep 8). Led by Samsung Electronics with co-leads Scaleup Europe Fund (EQT) and PSG Equity; new investors Advent, BlackRock funds, and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg; described as the largest equity round ever completed by a European tech company. Mistral says it operates across 20 countries with 125+ global enterprises. Source: Mistral AI – Mistral Makes Sovereign Open Weight Ai To Frontier
  • New hosted model: Z.ai GLM 5.3 (Sep 15). Third-party open-weight coding model, 1M context, 128K max output, $1.40/$4.40 per MTok, $0.14 cached input, served without Mistral modifications. Source: Mistral AI – Zai Glm 5 3
  • Deprecation: GLM 5.2 deprecated Sep 29, retires Oct 31. The model that anchored the August third-party launch lasted about seven weeks as flagship; GLM 5.3 is the stated replacement at identical pricing ($1.40/$4.40). Source: Mistral AI – Overview
  • Security: five Vibe CLI CVEs fixed in 2.25.4 (Sep 12). Shell permission bypasses (CVE-2026-87984 through -87988, some affecting versions back to 1.3.4) enabled arbitrary code execution and token exfiltration from hostile repository content; reported by SecMate Sep 5, advisory MAI-2026-003 published Sep 14, additional hardening shipped in 2.25.5/2.25.7/2.25.8. Sources: Secmate – Mistral Vibe Cve 2026 87987 Cve 2026 87984 , Mistral AI – Mai 2026 003
  • Billing mechanics now quantified on the API page. Regional inference +10%, cached input tokens -90%, Batch -50%, and Enterprise APIs (regional controls, system-level SLAs, higher rate limits) at 75% above list pricing on select APIs. Source: Mistral AI – Api
  • Plans now bundle API credits. Free $10/mo, Pro $30/mo, Education $15/mo in API credits; not recorded in the August baseline, so the effective date is undisclosed. Source: Mistral AI – Pricing
  • Deprecations: Leanstral 1.5 and OCR 4.0 retired Sep 30. Both were deprecated Sep 29, roughly three months after their June launches; OCR 4.1 ($4/1,000 pages OCR, $5/1,000 pages Document AI) is the replacement, and no Leanstral successor is named. Source: Mistral AI – Overview
  • No new first-party coding models. Mistral Medium 3.5 remains v26.04 (April 28) and Codestral remains v25.08 (July 2025); the August warning that the model gap versus GLM/Qwen open weights would become structural without a September Codestral refresh has now materialized. Sources: Mistral AI – Overview , Mistral AI – Mistral Medium 3 5 26 04
  • Partnerships: Cloudera (Sep 10) and Mozilla (Sep 16). Cloudera brings Mistral models to hybrid and fully air-gapped enterprise deployments across 30 exabytes of customer-managed data; Mozilla's Firefox Smart Window (beta) is powered by Mistral models in France and North America with zero data retention, UK and Germany to follow. Sources: Mistral AI – Mistral X Cloudera , Mistral AI – Mistral X Mozilla
  • Safety models listed: Shieldstral 1.0 and Mistral Moderation 2. Shieldstral 1.0 (Apache 2.0, compact multimodal moderation, launched Aug 4) appears in the docs catalog; Mistral Moderation 2 (128K context, jailbreak detection) is now free on the pricing page. Sources: Mistral AI – Overview , Mistral AI – Api

Plans

Plan Price (monthly) Price (annual) Usage limits Key inclusions
Free $0 undisclosed (monthly billing only shown) Limited messages, web searches, coding sessions (numbers undisclosed) Vibe web/mobile, Mistral Studio, $10/mo in API credits, 100+ connectors, image generation
Pro $14.99 (excluding taxes) undisclosed (monthly billing only shown) Up to 6x free messages, 5x free web searches, 40x free image generations (baselines undisclosed); Flash answers 150/day; task scheduling unlimited (fair usage) All-day coding in CLI/IDE/web, $30/mo in API credits, up to 15GB storage, chat and email support, model training opt-out
Team $24.99/user/mo (excluding taxes) undisclosed (monthly billing only shown) Same multipliers as Pro (baselines undisclosed); Flash answers 200/day; up to 30GB storage/user Everything in Pro, domain verification, data export, admin API, knowledge connectors
Education $5.99/mo (excluding taxes) n/a Pro-level limits (undisclosed baselines); $15/mo in API credits Pro features for verified students at accredited higher institutions, max 12 months, requires no prior Vibe/Le Chat usage
Enterprise Custom (contact sales) Custom Custom Custom models/agents/workflows, audit logs, SAML SSO, white label, custom deployments (self-hosted, private cloud, on-premises)

Source: Mistral AI – Pricing

Feature Comparison (from Pricing Page)

Feature Free Pro Team
Messages Baseline Up to 6x free Up to 6x free
Web searches Baseline Up to 5x free Up to 5x free
Image generation Baseline Up to 40x free Up to 40x free
Flash answers undisclosed 150/day 200/day
Task scheduling Up to 5 Unlimited (fair usage) Unlimited (fair usage)
Storage Limited Up to 15GB Up to 30GB/user
Project folders Up to 1,000 Up to 1,000 Up to 1,000
API credits $10/mo $30/mo undisclosed
Vibe CLI / IDE coding Limited Included (PAYG beyond) Included (PAYG beyond)
Remote coding agents Not included Included (PAYG) Included (PAYG)
Remote agent observability Not included Included Included
Hooks Not included Included Included
Teleport Not included Included Included
Connectors 100+ 100+ 100+
Custom MCP connectors (beta) Not included Beta Beta
Workflows / Skills / Canvas Limited Included Included
Extend usage with PAYG credits No Yes (at API rates) Yes (at API rates)
Model training opt-out No Yes Yes

Terms explained:

  • Flash answers - Quick, short responses; 150/day on Pro vs 200/day on Team, per the pricing FAQ. Source: Mistral AI – Pricing
  • Remote agent observability - Run history, tool calls, code changes, logs, and audit trails for remote coding sessions. Source: Mistral AI – Pricing
  • PAYG credits - Continue past plan limits at API rates. Source: Mistral AI – Pricing

API Pricing

Service tiers: Standard; Batch (-50%); Priority (committed service levels, custom rate limits, uptime SLA; price undisclosed). Configurable add-ons: regional inference (EU or US endpoints) at +10%; cached input tokens at -90%. Enterprise APIs (regional data processing controls, system-level SLAs, increased rate limits, premium support) are available at 75% above list pricing on select APIs. Source: Mistral AI – Api

Coding-Relevant Models

Model Type Input ($/MTok) Output ($/MTok) Cached input ($/MTok) Context Batch
Mistral Medium 3.5 Open (Modified MIT) $1.50 $7.50 undisclosed (-90% config applies) 256K -50%
Z.ai GLM 5.3 Third-party (open weights) $1.40 $4.40 $0.14 1M (128K max output) -50%
Z.ai GLM 5.2 Third-party (open weights) $1.40 $4.40 undisclosed undisclosed -50%
Codestral Premier $0.30 $0.90 undisclosed undisclosed -50%
Mistral Small 4 Open (Apache 2.0) $0.15 $0.60 undisclosed undisclosed -50%
Mistral Large 3 Open (Apache 2.0) $0.50 $1.50 undisclosed undisclosed -50%
Codestral Embed Premier $0.15/MTok (input only) n/a n/a n/a n/a

Sources: Mistral AI – Api , Mistral AI – Zai Glm 5 3 , Mistral AI – Mistral Medium 3 5 26 04

Other Models

Model Type Input ($/MTok) Output ($/MTok) Notes
Ministral 3 (3B) Open $0.10 $0.10 Edge
Ministral 3 (8B) Open $0.15 $0.15 Edge
Ministral 3 (14B) Open $0.20 $0.20 Edge
Mistral Embed Premier $0.10/MTok n/a Embedding
Mistral Moderation 2 Premier Free Free 128K context, jailbreak detection
Leanstral 1.5 Labs (Apache 2.0) Free Free Retired Sep 30, 2026

Specialist Models

Model Pricing
OCR 4.1 $4/1,000 pages (OCR API), $5/1,000 pages (Document AI)
OCR 3 remains listed for existing integrations
Voxtral Small $0.004/min audio input, $0.10/MTok text input, $0.40/MTok output
Voxtral Mini Transcribe 2 $0.003/min
Voxtral Mini Transcribe Realtime $0.006/min
Voxtral TTS $0.016/1,000 characters
Classifier API (3B) $0.10/$0.10 per MTok; training $1/MTok; storage $2/month per model (minimum $4 per job)
Classifier API (8B) $0.04/$0.04 per MTok; training $1/MTok; storage $2/month per model (minimum $4 per job)
Shieldstral 1.0 listed in docs catalog; price not shown on the pricing page

Tool / API Pricing

Service Price
Code execution $30/1,000 calls
Web search $30/1,000 calls
Image generation $100/1,000 images
Premium news $50/1,000 calls
Libraries OCR $3/1,000 pages
Libraries indexing $1/MTok
Libraries call $0.01/call
Data capture $0.04/MTok

Source: Mistral AI – Api

Model Performance / Benchmarks

Mistral published no new coding benchmarks in September, and the Medium 3.5 model card itself displays no benchmark table (only context, pricing, and feature lists). The only first-party published coding scores remain those from the May 22 launch post, re-verified this cycle:

Model Benchmark Score
Mistral Medium 3.5 SWE-Bench Verified 77.6%
Mistral Medium 3.5 tau3-Telecom 91.4

Mistral claims Medium 3.5 scores "ahead of Devstral 2 and models like Qwen3.5 397B A17B" on SWE-Bench Verified, with no independent verification. Source: Mistral AI – Vibe Remote Agents Mistral Medium 3 5

Hosted GLM 5.3 documentation lists no benchmark scores either (speed/performance are unlabeled sliders). Source: Mistral AI – Zai Glm 5 3

Community counterpoint: an HN commenter running business benchmarks reported "Mistral Medium 3.5 with reasoning is worse than Gemma 4 31B and Glimmer 30B. It's a 128B dense model that's priced accordingly!", which is unverified but consistent with the pattern that Mistral's last published coding benchmark is five months old. News – Item

Note: OpenAI stopped using SWE-Bench Verified due to contamination concerns; cross-provider comparisons on that benchmark should be treated with caution.

Latest News

Z.ai GLM 5.2 lands in Vibe Code (September 2, 2026)

The @mistralvibe account announced GLM 5.2 is available inside Vibe Code, extending the August 11 third-party hosting program (which started with GLM 5.2 on the API) into the coding agent itself. Sources: News – Item , Mistral AI – Regional Inference Open Models New Compute

Mistral raises €3B Series D (September 8, 2026)

€3 billion at more than €21 billion post-money, led by Samsung Electronics, co-led by Scaleup Europe Fund (EQT) and PSG Equity, with Advent, BlackRock-managed funds, and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg as new investors; Mistral calls it the largest equity fundraising round ever completed by a European technology company. The company states it operates across 20 countries and supports 125+ global enterprises including Airbus, ASML, and HSBC, and frames the round as scaling frontier research, compute capacity, and international commercial growth. Source: Mistral AI – Mistral Makes Sovereign Open Weight Ai To Frontier

Legacy Fortran modernization case study (September 9, 2026)

Applied AI post documenting a European energy operator's migration of 40,000 of 300,000 lines of Fortran 77 to C++ (a physics-intensive reservoir simulator): a numerical parity harness built before migration, over a hundred Vibe CLI agents documenting the codebase using document libraries and Mistral OCR, and a structured planner/coder/tester/reviewer workflow with human review gates beating both full autonomy and manual sessions. Source: Mistral AI – Legacy Code Modernization

Cloudera partnership (September 10, 2026)

Mistral models integrated with Cloudera's hybrid data platform for deployment across private/public cloud, on-prem, and fully air-gapped environments, plus custom model training against proprietary data; Cloudera cites 30 exabytes of customer-managed data on its platform. Source: Mistral AI – Mistral X Cloudera

Vibe CLI shell permission CVEs disclosed and fixed (September 5-14, 2026)

SecMate reported two report clusters (SECMATE-2026-0038/0039) on Sep 5; HiddenLayer published related advisories Sep 11; Mistral shipped the fail-closed fix in Vibe 2.25.4 on Sep 12 and advisory MAI-2026-003 on Sep 14, with additional hardening in 2.25.5, 2.25.7, and 2.25.8 (recommended minimum version). The bugs let hostile repository content turn allowlisted commands like cat README.md into arbitrary code execution via dropped environment assignments (e.g., PATH=./bin:$PATH), with a PoC exfiltrating the victim's Mistral token. Sources: Secmate – Mistral Vibe Cve 2026 87987 Cve 2026 87984 , Mistral AI – Mai 2026 003

Z.ai GLM 5.3 hosted on the platform (September 15, 2026)

Third-party open-weight coding model with 1M context and 128K max output at $1.40/$4.40 per MTok ($0.14 cached input), served without Mistral modifications; announced via @mistralvibe as "GLM 5.3 Hosted by Mistral" around Sep 21. GLM 5.2 was deprecated Sep 29 (retires Oct 31) in favor of it, at identical pricing. Sources: Mistral AI – Zai Glm 5 3 , News – Item , Mistral AI – Overview

Mozilla Firefox Smart Window partnership (September 16, 2026)

Firefox Smart Window (beta), Mozilla's AI browsing assistant, is now powered by Mistral models for users in France and North America, with the UK and Germany expected later in 2026; conversations are not saved on Mozilla servers by default and Mistral agrees to zero data retention. Source: Mistral AI – Mistral X Mozilla

Mensch's "AI is software" interview and 'negligence' remarks (September 24-29, 2026)

In a Le Monde interview, Arthur Mensch argued "AI is software. It can be controlled," positioning Mistral against US labs' safety framing; follow-up coverage (CNBC, Sep 29) reported his claim that the US AI safety debate masks competitors' 'negligence'. HN threads: News – Item (99 points, 169 comments) , News – Item (51 points)

Munich hub and month-end deprecations (September 28-30, 2026)

Mistral opened a German hub in Munich to advance industrial AI in Europe's largest economy (Sep 28). On Sep 29 the docs deprecation table was updated: GLM 5.2 (retire Oct 31), Leanstral 1.5 (retired Sep 30, no successor named), and OCR 4.0 (retired Sep 30, replaced by OCR 4.1). Sources: Mistral AI – News , Mistral AI – Overview

Community Signals

€3B raise thread: sovereignty endorsed, models roasted (850 points, 603 comments)

September's biggest Mistral discussion on HackerNews was the fundraise. The top substantive comments split between backing the sovereignty strategy and attacking the model quality and pricing.

  • nik736: "I really do hope they can catch up with the American models... In our business benchmarks their Mistral Medium 3.5 with reasoning is worse than Gemma 4 31B and Glimmer 30B. It's a 128B dense model that's priced accordingly! Mistral Small 4 is way worse than Gemma 4 26B A4B... Their API pricing is just insane for what you get." News – Item
  • davedx: "Mistral is an interesting AI company because they clearly have a contrarian business strategy to the other AI labs... People dump on them because they're not benchmaxxxing which is pretty shortsighted - do you really want to be in a benchmark arms race with China, or do you want to make money and deploy sovereign AI compute in Europe?" News – Item
  • rldjbpin (work access to the platform): "the 'best' model, or the one i've used the most so far is GLM-5.2! for all the promise, i would temper my expectations for a frontier model for coding or general purpose. but for niche use cases (document parsing, voice*, etc.) and as a platform to handle finetuned versions... i can see the value of partnering with them. if the core model could be any open-weights solution out there, the moat dissolves really quickly." News – Item
  • sbinnee: "I am still waiting for their large model... There is no 3.5 small nor large not to mention no 4 medium nor 4 large. These model numbers to me seem like that their model release did not meet the schedule. I am still waiting for 4 large and expect it to match at least glm 5.2 performance." News – Item
  • AidenVennis: "Mistral should not focus on competing with Claude Fable or OpenAI's Astra at first but have a good EU alternative to Opus or even Sonnet. The fact that it's European will be enough to be used by a lot of companies and governments in the EU." News – Item

Thread: News – Item

Le Monde interview thread: "AI is software" gets pushback (99 points, 169 comments)

Mensch's controllability argument drew technical rebuttals.

  • Aransentin: "'X is made of ' is a fully general counterargument for why anything whatsoever is controllable. A human is just a few chemical reactions... it's enough to have an open model run its own weights and make money from scamming elderly people or the like, and it'll keep running as long as anyone anywhere is willing to make money by renting hardware to it." News – Item
  • tpoacher: "Depends on your definition of 'controlled'... Boeing's MCAS system was also 'just software'... But then people died precisely because pilots found themselves unable to override or 'control' the systems precisely when it mattered." News – Item
  • neom (on the frontier-lab rebuttal): "Jack Clark from anthropic was asked about some version of this on the BBC recently, and his reply was basically: If you're not at the frontier, you don't know what the frontier looks like, he implied that many models are simply not good enough yet to encounter some of the things the leadings labs are encountering." News – Item

Thread: News – Item

Vibe CLI CVE disclosure (low traction, high relevance)

SecMate's writeup of the shell permission bypass barely registered on HN (1 point), but it is the most consequential coding-agent news of the month for Vibe users: upgrade to 2.25.8 or later. News – Item , Secmate – Mistral Vibe Cve 2026 87987 Cve 2026 87984

Searches run

HN Algolia queries: "mistral" (by_date, tags=story, since 2026-08-14), "codestral" (0 hits in window), "mistral vibe" (4 hits). Reddit search (Old – Search) returned a login wall and could not be used, matching prior months; no Reddit signals extracted.

Reddit recovery (added 2026-10-03)

The Series D also carried Reddit: r/eutech (991 upvotes): "Mistral raises €3 billion for the development of..." Reddit – Mistral Raises 3 Billion For The Development Of . Product-side Reddit footprint is near zero: the Mistral Vibe CLI community counted 358 weekly visitors with 0 weekly contributions in the October 3 capture.

Enterprise Readiness

Feature Available? Details
SSO (SAML/OIDC) Partial SAML SSO listed on the Enterprise plan; OIDC not mentioned. Source: Mistral AI – Pricing
SCIM No Not mentioned on the pricing page.
Audit logs Yes Enterprise plan; also remote agent observability (run history, tool calls, logs, audit trails) on paid coding tiers. Source: Mistral AI – Pricing
IP indemnity No Not mentioned on pricing or product pages.
Data residency Yes Regional Endpoints generally available: choose EU or US inference with in-region processing at +10% pricing; limited, safeguarded sub-processor transfers described in the Trust Center. Sources: Mistral AI – Regional Inference Open Models New Compute , Mistral AI – Api
HIPAA No Not mentioned on the pricing page.
Air-gapped / on-prem Yes Custom deployments (self-hosted, private cloud, on-premises) on Enterprise; Cloudera partnership covers fully air-gapped environments; open-weight models (Medium 3.5 on as few as four GPUs) can be self-hosted. Sources: Mistral AI – Pricing , Mistral AI – Mistral X Cloudera , Mistral AI – Vibe Remote Agents Mistral Medium 3 5
SLA Partial Priority Tier (public preview) offers an uptime SLA with custom rate limits; Enterprise APIs include system-level SLAs; terms and pricing undisclosed. Sources: Mistral AI – Regional Inference Open Models New Compute , Mistral AI – Api
Admin controls (RBAC) Yes Admin API (users, teams, permissions), domain verification, data export, white label, dedicated hostname. Source: Mistral AI – Pricing

Terms explained:

Transparency Gaps

Gap Details Severity
Vibe usage limits Messages "up to 6x free", searches "5x free", image generation "40x free" with no baseline numbers; Free-tier limits entirely unquantified. High
Vibe CLI/IDE model copy Pricing page still says Vibe CLI and Vibe for IDE are "powered by Devstral" although Devstral 2 retired July 31, 2026; the actual CLI/IDE successor model is undisclosed. High
No first-party coding benchmark since May Medium 3.5's SWE-Bench Verified 77.6% is five months old, the model card shows no scores, and GLM 5.3's hosted docs publish none. High
Priority Tier pricing Committed service levels, custom rate limits, and an uptime SLA are offered with no published price or SLA percentages. Medium
Enterprise APIs scope "+75% above list pricing on select APIs" without listing which APIs qualify or what the SLAs guarantee. Medium
API credits terms Free $10/mo, Pro $30/mo, Education $15/mo credits are listed with no rollover, expiry, or scope documentation. Medium
Model churn without successors Leanstral 1.5 retired Sep 30 (about 3 months after launch) with no named successor; GLM 5.2 hosted for about 7 weeks before deprecation; OCR 4.0 retired about 3 months after launch. Medium
Context windows Published only for Medium 3.5 (256K) and GLM 5.3 (1M/128K output); Codestral, Small 4, Large 3, and GLM 5.2 list none on the pricing page. Medium
Cached input pricing per model Only GLM 5.3 publishes an explicit cached-input rate ($0.14/MTok); others rely on the global "-90% on input" configurator without per-model numbers. Medium
Rate limits (RPM/TPM) Not published for any tier; Priority Tier's "custom rate limits" are sales-configured. Medium
CVE-2026-87988 fix history Mistral's own advisory shows partial fixes in 2.20.0 and 2.23.0 with reported option bypasses persisting through 2.25.3, and Mistral was still reconciling CVSS scores with HiddenLayer at publication. Low